《電子技術(shù)應(yīng)用》
您所在的位置:首頁 > 其他 > 設(shè)計(jì)應(yīng)用 > 禮讓視域下GDPR域外管轄的沖突及中國(guó)的因應(yīng)
禮讓視域下GDPR域外管轄的沖突及中國(guó)的因應(yīng)
網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理
程千帆
海南大學(xué)法學(xué)院
摘要: 在數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代,數(shù)據(jù)已經(jīng)成為了一種全新的資產(chǎn)類型,,國(guó)家對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)的掌控能力成為其綜合國(guó)力的外在體現(xiàn),,而當(dāng)代國(guó)家對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)重視與保護(hù)加劇了數(shù)據(jù)管轄權(quán)沖突,。在此情形下,,歐盟《通用數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)條例》(GDPR)通過“實(shí)體標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”“目的指向標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”“使領(lǐng)館標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”三重管轄擴(kuò)張實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)全球數(shù)據(jù)的“長(zhǎng)臂管轄”,,但其關(guān)于適用地域范圍的規(guī)定與其他國(guó)家的屬地管轄沖突,,體現(xiàn)出歐盟在數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)方面呈現(xiàn)出單邊擴(kuò)張的趨勢(shì),,易誘發(fā)數(shù)據(jù)管轄權(quán)沖突,。故此,,基于優(yōu)利克?胡伯提出解決管轄沖突的“國(guó)際禮讓原則”,,分析GDPR三個(gè)適用地域界定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)下存在的管轄權(quán)沖突,考察國(guó)際禮讓原則在數(shù)據(jù)管轄權(quán)沖突中可用性與適用基礎(chǔ),,并對(duì)不同禮讓形式在數(shù)據(jù)管轄權(quán)沖突中的適用予以分析,,并基于GDPR域外適用管轄權(quán)沖突提出補(bǔ)充數(shù)據(jù)管轄模式、對(duì)接國(guó)際跨域數(shù)據(jù)治理,、堅(jiān)持禮讓互惠協(xié)作的中國(guó)因應(yīng),,以期為我國(guó)暢通域外數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)提供新思路。
中圖分類號(hào):D92文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼:ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2024.05.011
引用格式:程千帆.禮讓視域下GDPR域外管轄的沖突及中國(guó)的因應(yīng)[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,,2024,,43(5):76-82.
The conflict of extraterritorial jurisdiction of the GDPR in the context of comity and China′s response
Cheng Qianfan
College of Law, Hainan University
Abstract: In the era of digital economy, data has become a brand-new type of asset.A country′s ability to grasp and control data has become an external manifestation of its comprehensive national power, while the contemporary national emphasis on data and its protection has exacerbated the conflict of data jurisdiction. In this case, the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) realizes the expansion of jurisdiction over global data through the triple standards of "entity standard", "purpose-directed standard" and "embassy and consulate standard". The GDPR realizes the "long arm jurisdiction" over global data, but its provisions on the applicable geographical scope are in conflict with the territorial jurisdiction, which reflects the trend of unilateral expansion of the EU′s data protection, which is prone to inducing data jurisdiction conflicts.
Key words : GDPR; international comity; extraterritorial application; conflicts of jurisdiction

引言

數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代下國(guó)家間的管轄權(quán)沖突向數(shù)據(jù)領(lǐng)域全面延伸,數(shù)字化疆域成為國(guó)家間時(shí)代競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的新戰(zhàn)場(chǎng),。歐盟為了維護(hù)自身利益,,制定了《通用數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)條例》(GDPR),通過第3條相關(guān)規(guī)定,,使得歐盟與數(shù)據(jù)控制者和處理者之間的合作關(guān)系得到顯著提升,。值得注意的是,即使數(shù)據(jù)控制者和處理者不在地域適用范圍內(nèi),,但只要符合管轄標(biāo)準(zhǔn)就必須承擔(dān)由GDPR規(guī)定的義務(wù)[1],。盡管中國(guó)尚未出現(xiàn)典型的數(shù)據(jù)管轄權(quán)沖突案例,但由于數(shù)據(jù)規(guī)則的不完善,,這種沖突仍有可能發(fā)生,。因此,為了保護(hù)我國(guó)的數(shù)據(jù)安全,,有效應(yīng)對(duì)美國(guó)在數(shù)據(jù)治理領(lǐng)域日益增長(zhǎng)的“數(shù)據(jù)霸權(quán)”,,有必要明晰禮讓原則在數(shù)據(jù)管轄權(quán)沖突中的適用。


本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請(qǐng)下載:

http://forexkbc.com/resource/share/2000006019


作者信息:

程千帆

(海南大學(xué)法學(xué)院,,海南???70228)


Magazine.Subscription.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載,。