《電子技術(shù)應(yīng)用》
您所在的位置:首頁 > 其他 > 設(shè)計(jì)應(yīng)用 > 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺(tái)消費(fèi)者個(gè)人信息權(quán)益反壟斷法保護(hù)
互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺(tái)消費(fèi)者個(gè)人信息權(quán)益反壟斷法保護(hù)
網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理 6期
孫夢(mèng)如
(南京審計(jì)大學(xué)法學(xué)院,江蘇南京211815)
摘要: 在數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代,,數(shù)據(jù)是數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)的核心生產(chǎn)要素,。個(gè)人隱私數(shù)據(jù)事關(guān)消費(fèi)者的切身利益,算法在提升互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺(tái)智能化服務(wù)水平的同時(shí),也提高了個(gè)人隱私數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)的難度。大數(shù)據(jù)的發(fā)展加速了隱私保護(hù)與反壟斷法的交融,將隱私數(shù)據(jù)等非價(jià)格因素納入反壟斷法保護(hù)的價(jià)值目標(biāo)之中,,越來越受到理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界專家學(xué)者的認(rèn)同,,但反壟斷法介入消費(fèi)者隱私保護(hù)存在制度短板限制了其本身具有的保護(hù)優(yōu)勢(shì)。鑒于此,,從法律制度出發(fā),,在價(jià)值層面、分析方法和基本制度方面對(duì)反壟斷法進(jìn)行適當(dāng)調(diào)整,,來擴(kuò)大消費(fèi)者福利指標(biāo)范圍,、發(fā)展替代性分析工具、引入均衡性原則衡量利益沖突以適應(yīng)數(shù)字市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,。
中圖分類號(hào):D92
文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼:A
DOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2023.06.008
引用格式:孫夢(mèng)如.互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺(tái)消費(fèi)者個(gè)人信息權(quán)益反壟斷法保護(hù)[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,,2023,42(6):48-53.
Protection of consumer personal information rights and interests on Internet platforms under the antimonopoly law
Sun Mengru
(School of Law, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815, China)
Abstract: In the digital economy era, data is the core production factor of the digital economy. Personal privacy data is related to the vital interests of consumers, and algorithms not only improve the intelligent service level of Internet platforms, but also increase the difficulty of protecting personal privacy data. The development of big data has accelerated the integration of privacy protection and antimonopoly law, incorporating non price factors such as private data into the value objectives of antimonopoly law protection, which is increasingly recognized by theoretical and practical experts and scholars. However, the institutional shortcomings of antimonopoly law intervention in consumer privacy protection limit its own protection advantages. In view of this, starting from the legal system, through the aspects of value, analysis method and basic system, antimonopoly law is properly adjusted to expand the range of consumer welfare indicators, develop alternative analysis tools, and introduce the principle of balance to measure conflicts of interest to adapt to the development of digital market economy.
Key words : individual information protection; antimonopoly; consumer welfare; Alexi component formula

0    引言

2022年6月24日,,我國(guó)通過了關(guān)于修改反壟斷法的決定,,新修訂《反壟斷法》強(qiáng)調(diào)經(jīng)營(yíng)者不能利用數(shù)據(jù)和算法實(shí)施壟斷行為。當(dāng)前,,對(duì)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)范主要采用反壟斷方式,,并取得了積極效果。數(shù)據(jù)的自由流通是企業(yè)提高經(jīng)濟(jì)效率,、促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要媒介,,但同時(shí)也對(duì)消費(fèi)者個(gè)人隱私安全造成了一定威脅。對(duì)“數(shù)據(jù)隱私保護(hù)是否需要反壟斷法介入進(jìn)行監(jiān)管”的討論濫觴于2007年Google并購(gòu)DdoubleClick案,。理論界對(duì)于該問題有不同的認(rèn)識(shí),,有學(xué)者持獨(dú)立保護(hù)模式立場(chǎng),認(rèn)為數(shù)字時(shí)代的到來使得數(shù)據(jù)隱私保護(hù)與價(jià)格保護(hù)同等重要,,應(yīng)將其作為一項(xiàng)獨(dú)立的消費(fèi)者福利內(nèi)容而被反壟斷法保護(hù),。公法與私法對(duì)隱私的保護(hù)存在著明顯的不足,需要反壟斷加以維護(hù),。相反,有學(xué)者認(rèn)為侵害消費(fèi)者個(gè)人信息權(quán)益等侵權(quán)行為,,繞開侵權(quán)法推理模式而取道于競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法并非明智之舉,,裁判應(yīng)當(dāng)建立在嚴(yán)密的推理之上。然而,,也有部分學(xué)者采取中立的態(tài)度,,認(rèn)為加強(qiáng)個(gè)人信息保護(hù)與價(jià)格保護(hù)處于同等重要的地位,對(duì)其保護(hù)采用附屬保護(hù)與獨(dú)立保護(hù)并重的方式,。



本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請(qǐng)下載:http://forexkbc.com/resource/share/2000005373




作者信息:

孫夢(mèng)如

(南京審計(jì)大學(xué)法學(xué)院,,江蘇南京211815)


微信圖片_20210517164139.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載,。